-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
Added the docs for the "groups" constraint option #11092
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for this huge PR! This is awesome. Sorry for the comments, but we need to not forget about them.
This was on my to-do list for a long time, also I thought we could use some "inherited" options as we do for form types. WDYT?
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ an object and all sub-objects associated with it. | |||
+----------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | |||
| Options | - `traverse`_ | | |||
| | - `payload`_ | | |||
| | - `groups`_ | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wrong order
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is tricky ... because the original options are not sorted either ... I'm going to try to fix some of the issues you reported ... but I won't make many changes. I want to submit a PR to 4.2 to change the format of the RST tables (they are a nightmare to maintain right now) and to sort all options (lots of them are not). I cannot do this in 3.4 because it will be impossible to merge in 4.2. Too many conflicts. Thanks for understanding.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Many thanks! Also, yes Valid
and All
also have the groups
option.
…reguiluz) This PR was squashed before being merged into the 3.4 branch (closes #11092). Discussion ---------- Added the docs for the "groups" constraint option This continues #9557. Question to reviewers: does this option apply to Valid and All constraints too? Commits ------- da9aa0e Added the docs for the \"groups\" constraint option
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 4.2 branch (closes #11101). Discussion ---------- Sort all validator constraints options This continues #11092 and: simplifies RST tables, sorts option names and option descriptions (and fix some minor issues like missing option names in the tables). It's impossible to review (because git doesn't detect correctly all the moved contents), so I'm going to merge it. Commits ------- 34d8337 Sort all validator constraints options
This continues #9557.
Question to reviewers: does this option apply to Valid and All constraints too?